On 2019/01/05 10:55, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > A general question: I would like to port a i3 with gaps[1], should we go > with a second port (i3-gaps) of should we improve x11/i3 with patches? > > RS > > [1]: https://github.com/Airblader/i3/tree/gaps
That looks like it should be a separate port. I think ideally it shouldn't conflict with i3, so it's possible to try it out more easily?
