On 2019/01/07 16:42, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:35:51PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Trying to build some ports on macppc, glib2 is now broken: > > > > FAILED: glib/4430778@@glib-2.0@sha/gatomic.c.o > > cc -Iglib/4430778@@glib-2.0@sha -Iglib -I../glib-2.58.2/glib -I. > > -I../glib-2.58.2/ -I/usr/local/include -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > -std=gnu89 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes > > -Wunused -Wno-bad-function-cast -Werror=declaration-after-statement > > -Werror=format=2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=init-self > > -Werror=missing-include-dirs -Werror=missing-prototypes > > -Werror=pointer-arith -O2 -g -fPIC -pthread '-DG_LOG_DOMAIN="GLib"' > > -DGLIB_COMPILATION -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MQ > > 'glib/4430778@@glib-2.0@sha/gatomic.c.o' -MF > > 'glib/4430778@@glib-2.0@sha/gatomic.c.o.d' -o > > 'glib/4430778@@glib-2.0@sha/gatomic.c.o' -c ../glib-2.58.2/glib/gatomic.c > > ../glib-2.58.2/glib/gatomic.c:675:2: error: #error G_ATOMIC_LOCK_FREE > > defined, but incapable of lock-free atomics. > > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. > > Probably a broken test at configure time? > > -- > Antoine >
This is the one landry ran into the other day I think? I've seen similar before where an autoconf script does a test compile (to a .o) but doesn't try linking and/or running it so the error doesn't show up.
