On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:21:48PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:44:55PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > > It annoys me that chrome doesn't start on screen 9 like firefox does. > > (Especially since it takes a few seconds to start, so I'm always surprised > > when the window finally appears and disrupts my current screen.) > > Easily fixed. > Which rules to add to or remove from upstream's set as well as the > specified tags have great potential for bike shedding. > > Since dwm is designed to be patched and recompiled for personal taste, > I tend to avoid such changes in our port and leave them to users. > > On the other hand, the firefox rule has been there for ages and doing > the same with chromium makes sense consistency wise. > > That said, no objections from me, but please refrain from further > config patches or send them directly upstream. > > Does that make sense? >
Should we add Iridium too then to stay consistent with chromium and firefox? From statistics[1] of my small samples (17 amd64 6.4-current machines), I see 5 iridium, 7 chromium and 13 firefox installed. [1] https://pkgstat-openbsd.perso.pw/index.php?osversion=6.4-current&arch=amd64
