On Mon 04/02/2019 16:56, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> there's something weird regarding how newer versions are supposed to be
> handled here: we don't encode the full upstream version in the
> DISTNAME/PKGNAME, so right now we can't easily bump from 2.48.15v3 to
> 2.48.15v4* because the distfile name would be the same, but with
> different content/checksum.
>
> The diff below encodes the full tag name in DISTNAME, and uses "pl"
> ("patch level") to encode the version in PKGNAME.
> Since 2.48.15p1 < 2.48.15pl3, REVISION can be dropped. make update
> tested with the no_x11 FLAVOR.
>
> ok?
Makes sense, OK.
