Ryan Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:10:50PM +0100, Steven Mestdagh wrote: > > Ryan Freeman [2019-03-17, 14:09:08]: > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 07:52:50PM +0000, Bryan Everly wrote: > > > > Hi Ports@, > > > > > > > > Below is the terminal output I get when I try to launch the chromium > > > > build (latest & greatest package from snapshots) on the latest snapshot: > > > > > > > > $ chrome > > > > [40668:1870462320:0315/155107.446613:ERROR:process_metrics_openbsd.cc(126)] > > > > Not implemented reached in bool > > > > base::GetSystemMemoryInfo(base::SystemMemoryInfoKB *) > > > > [40668:1870462320:0315/155107.464615:ERROR:process_posix.cc(388)] Not > > > > implemented reached in base::Time base::Process::CreationTime() const > > > > Abort trap (core dumped) > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > I still haven't been able to figure out what is causing this, my post > > > here: > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=155181090804746&w=2 > > > > In your dmesg: > > chrome[55191]: pledge "", syscall 203 > > > > I see similar behavior with chrome (amd64), where pledge does not permit > > the mlock syscall, and the program is aborted. > > I use xenodm with xfce. If I run chrome as a different user than the one > > logged into xenodm, it works fine. I've also tried it with a clean profile, > > makes no difference. > > This started to happen +/- end of January. > > > > Thanks, I recently was able to test a fresh user with fresh gnome launch, > after stsp@ figured out the issue that was preventing gnome from successfully > running. > > So, with a clean user and clean gnome install, chrome (and iridum) both just > abort trap with the same error, and the same pledge syscall error you > pointed out above. > > Try as I might, I have yet to figure out exactly what is causing this, > especially since clean user can't even run it if gnome (or XFCE?) is > involved.
ktrace -di then study the result That's the procedure almost everyone has to follow to "figure out".
