Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/08/11 13:33, Brian Callahan wrote:
> >
> > Sure, but do you mind sweeping the tree for this do-install idiom? It's
> > probably not in too many places these days, but it's certainly in more
> > than just this one port.
>
> If other ports are being touched can we have something that avoids a
> fork for every file please? Some of these have tens of thousands of
> files.
>
> Since ownership isn't important any more (now we build ports as
> non-root) it might be simplest just to cp nowadays.
Inconveniently, find -exec {} + requires that {} go last, not followed by
destination. Maybe some way to sh around that.
