On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 01:47:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/08/20 14:39, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:48:09AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > On Aug 15 18:30:20, j...@wxcvbn.org wrote:
> > > > Committed, thanks!
> > > 
> > > So now, with openrsync in base (thank you Kristaps),
> > > rsync can finaly go.
> > 
> > As of now, the main point of openrsync is to be able to test
> > interoperability of the protocol itself.
> > 
> > There's still a lot of work to be done before it can actually
> > replace full-featured rsync.
> > 
> 
> And it currently only speaks a really old protocol version that, amongst
> other things, doesn't do incremental filelist updates, so it is likely to use
> a bunch more RAM if you are transferring large numbers of files. Please 
> consider
> that if you are fetching anything from public rsync servers..

Ouch, it's even worse than I expected :(

Reply via email to