On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 01:47:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/08/20 14:39, Marc Espie wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:48:09AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > > > On Aug 15 18:30:20, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Committed, thanks! > > > > > > So now, with openrsync in base (thank you Kristaps), > > > rsync can finaly go. > > > > As of now, the main point of openrsync is to be able to test > > interoperability of the protocol itself. > > > > There's still a lot of work to be done before it can actually > > replace full-featured rsync. > > > > And it currently only speaks a really old protocol version that, amongst > other things, doesn't do incremental filelist updates, so it is likely to use > a bunch more RAM if you are transferring large numbers of files. Please > consider > that if you are fetching anything from public rsync servers..
Ouch, it's even worse than I expected :(
