On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 2:22 PM Charlene Wendling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:32:52 -0500 > Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > > > On Friday, August 30, 2019, wen heping <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Here is a patch for databases/p5-Mojo-Pg: > > > i) Update to 4.15 > > > ii) Fix LICENSE to artistic 2.0 > > > > > > > Hi Wen, > > > > I think that perl implied artistic 2.0, is that on longer true? (Or > > has it never been true? ) > > It's true, but artistic 2.0 per se does not imply Perl as a license > marker (may it be for CPAN or for us). > > Perl is distributed under either the GPL or Artistic 2.0 [0], and only > modules mentioning the dual licensing, or the famous "under the same > terms as Perl itself" should have the Perl license marker. > > Mojo-Pg is released only under the term of the Artistic 2.0 license > [1], so the fix is real. > You are correct. OK maintaner thanks > > OK cwen@ > > > [0] https://dev.perl.org/licenses/ > [1] https://metacpan.org/pod/Mojo::Pg#COPYRIGHT-AND-LICENSE > >
