On 2019/09/14 00:44, Kaashif Hymabaccus wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 10:05:30AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2019/09/01 19:20, Kaashif Hymabaccus wrote: > > > Hi ports@, > > > > > > Here is the new release of rss2email. As before, it is a new port and > > > not an update of rss2email since it is completely incompatible and I > > > don't want to break users' perfectly fine configurations. > > > > Let's just cut across and tell people in release notes to save > > their config first. 2.x will not be seeing any updates and it's a one > > time change. I've put an @ask-update in pkg/PLIST so that people know > > to save feeds, and will write something for faq/current.html (to copy > > to OpenBSD upgrade notes) telling people what to do. > > > > Other changes compared to your version, remove HOMEPAGE (it's the default > > for a MODPY_PI=Yes port), remove TEST_DEPENDS (RUN_DEPENDS is automatically > > added, see "make show=TEST_DEPENDS"), rerun "make plist". > > > > OK? > > Thanks for the improvements to my update. > > While I would like this committed, I am actually especially interested > in whether someone has a feed that breaks 3.10 in some way. I get the > feeling that maybe some OpenBSD devs are regular users of rss2email > 2.71 (sthen@, maybe jca@?), so they might have some nontrivial feeds > to test the config migration to 3.10 and all of the other new stuff. > > Any testers (and bug reports, diffs) are welcome of course. >
It's already committed. Other than the problem which I ran into with georss which I patched in feedparser, it has been happy with everything I've thrown at it.
