On 2019/09/23 16:17, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 08:47:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2019/09/23 17:52, clematis wrote: > > > Slightly tweaked version attached. s/sha/SHA/ in COMMENT, and add the > > missing WANTLIB/LIB_DEPENDS. This one is OK sthen@ if somebody would like > > to import it. > > Did we really want to name it py-pysha3? I figure py-sha3 is what we would > usually do in that case. (See pytest -> py-test, pydot -> py-dot, others) > > Otherwise I'm fine with the port (and can import). > > --Kurt >
We have it both ways, personally I prefer it this way (portgen does this also) but I don't mind much either way. But I've just noticed, this is a backport and not needed for py3.6+, so we should kill the flavour.
