On 10/04 06:12, Pierre-Emmanuel Andr? wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 11:26:13AM -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > On 10/03 09:01, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > > PostgreSQL 12.0 was released today. Here's a diff to update to it. > > > Tested briefly on amd64, no issues noted. > > > > You will probably need this diff for postgresql-previous to build > > the package for postgresql. > > > > Hi, > > Looks good to me. Almost the same diff in my tree. > We must put this diff in a bulk to see what will fail. > Thank you Jeremy :)
I don't think this is ready for bulk testing yet. There is usually a large amount of fallout in a PostgreSQL upgrade. At the very least, we should run a partial bulk of the direct dependencies and make sure they all build before requesting a full bulk. In my experience, it is many hours of work fixing dependencies to get the ports tree ready. It may be a good time to reassess whether some dependencies are still needed. For example, postgresql-v8 uses a 5+ year old version that has been patched to handle changes in PostgreSQL internals. Upstream switched the build system a few years ago and I could not get newer versions to build correctly when handling the PostgreSQL 10->11 update. Thanks, Jeremy
