On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 12:06:03AM -0500, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> The erlang21 FLAVOR of devel/rebar does not build. It will fail to build
> and thus DPB will never try the other FLAVORS because of the lock hanging
> around. (I've checked, the other two FLAVORs do build on sparc64).
> Rather than mark the whole port BROKEN for these architectures, this
> just drops the erlang21 FLAVOR for sparc64/mips64 so the other flavors
> can build.
> Yes, the better solution would be to fix the erlang21 FLAVOR, but I
> don't know how to do that.
For the record, this is a bad idea. DPB gets unhappy.
--Kurt
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/rebar/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.24
> diff -u -p -r1.24 Makefile
> --- Makefile 14 Feb 2020 13:15:36 -0000 1.24
> +++ Makefile 16 Feb 2020 03:00:20 -0000
> @@ -17,7 +17,13 @@ PERMIT_PACKAGE= Yes
>
> # This port cannot use the erlang module for the module depends on this port.
> # Keep in sync with erlang.port.mk
> +
> +# erlang21 broken on sparc64/mips64 and keeps other flavors from building
> +.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "sparc64" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "mips64"
> +FLAVORS = erlang16 erlang19
> +.else
> FLAVORS = erlang16 erlang19 erlang21
> +.endif
> FLAVOR ?= erlang16
>
> .if ${FLAVOR:Merlang16} || ${FLAVOR:Merlang19 || ${FLAVOR:Merlang21}}
>
