On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:43:20PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
>
> > Am 31.05.2020 um 15:49 schrieb Klemens Nanni <k...@openbsd.org>:
> > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 01:39:30PM +0000, Lucas wrote:
> >> FTR, I originally removed the patch for config.def.h completely in
> >> dmenu as I didn't see much point in introducing a patch just for
> >> changing some colors, which can be changed with parameters and seem
> >> quite randomly chosen (they don't match CSS for OpenBSD site, which I
> >> think is the only official thing that can be considered as some sort of
> >> colorscheme).
> > Let's do one thing at a time, if others later decide to change colors
> > they can do so, I'd like to fix the fonts due the implied dependencies,
> > all else I'd like to leave the any future porter/MAINTAINER.
>
> This topic comes up every few months for either of the suckless ports,
> see archives. Developers (e.g. tedu and myself), who are actively using
> dwm have stated that they prefer to keep color patches (across suckless
> ports) instead of following the randomly changing upstream colors -
> think of it as principal of least surprise after upgrades.
>
> IMHO this includes keeping Terminus, despite upstream dropped it long
> time ago already. So, I’m not in favor of the proposed patch, but would
> not object, if you insist on moving on this way.
>
> Either way, I can take care of maintaining DWM.
Not that I get a vote, but I would *prefer* the ports to be left as-is.
I like Terminus just fine, and just pkg_add'ing the port is convenient.
Joachim
