Hi Nils --

On Friday, July 24, 2020 2:56 PM, Nils Reuße <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2020-07-15 22:59, Nils Reuße wrote:
>
> > On 2020-07-15 16:58, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> >
> > > On 2020-07-14, Nils Reuße [email protected] wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am not too sure about adding "-I$(top_srcdir)" to the DEFAULT_INCLUDES
> > > > in the two Makefiles (for the two subdirectories), but I couldn't get it
> > > > to compile otherwise.  The affected includes are in subdirectories of
> > > > the source, but the compilation step is executed from build_amd64, and
> > > > then the already present "-I$(top_builddir)" resolves to .. (the top dir
> > > > of build_amd64) and not the top dir of the source code subdir.
> > >
> > > Presumably that problem is caused by SEPARATE_BUILD.  Patching
> > > around problems caused by SEPARATE_BUILD is not worth it, just drop
> > > the SEPARATE_BUILD.
> >
> > Thanks, that did the trick.  The attached diff has removed the
> > SEPARATE_BUILD variable as well as the superfluous Makefile.in-patches.
> > Kind regards
> > Nils
>
> Friendly fridays ping ;)

If you're going to use the gnu servers, it is best to use 
MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_GNU:=gnubg/}. Has the added benefit of using https 
too.

When I run `make update-plist`, the PLIST changes.

~Brian

Reply via email to