On 2020/08/24 20:21, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > Attached are updates to gpg2 and libksba. The ksba update isn't strictly > necessary for the gpg update, but we may as well. > > For gpg, the sendmail patch is no longer needed, as there is now a > configure check. > > For libksba, although the header only adds new constants and prototypes, > diffing nm(1) output suggests some symbols have disappeared, hence the > major SHARED_LIBS bump. > > All tests pass, but I'll do a mulk [0] to check it doesn't obviously > break anything. > > Comments? OK?
OK sthen@ > # don't mix up dependencies with gnupg1 Is it time to retire gnupg1 and merge gnupg2 into security/gnupg? Both the dependency handling and patches to use suffixed binary names are awkward with the current situation.
