On 9/5/20 8:33 PM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05 2020, Edd Barrett <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've been talking about trying to remove security/gnupg (i.e. gpg
>> version 1) for some time, and the recent plist clash has given me the
>> kick up the butt I needed to look more seriously at this.
>>
>> Below is a list of things that still depend upon gpg1, by maintainer, as
>> determined by:
>>
>> select fullpkgpath from ports where build_depends glob 
>> '*security/gnupg[^2]*' or run_depends glob '*security/gnupg[^2]*' order by 
>> maintainer;
> 
> This doesn't catch everything.
> 
>> Let's see if we can move these to gpg2. I'll start by working my way
>> through the ports with no maintainer. I'd appreciate it if maintainers
>> could help out with their ports.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>>
>> bluhm@:
>>     security/p5-Module-Signature
>>
>> giovanni@:
>>     databases/mysql-zrm
>>     mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
>>
>> feinerer@:
>>     security/fwknop
>>
>> robert@:
>>     www/rt
>>
>> semarie@:
>>     www/weboob
>>
>> solene@:
>>     mail/mailpile
> 
> + gsoares@:
> +     security/p5-GnuPG
> 
> + kmos@:
> +     net/py-slixmpp
> 
>> No maintainer:
>>     mail/pine-pgp-filters
>>     security/py-gnupg
>>     security/py-gnupg,python3
>>     security/clamav-unofficial-sigs
> 
> +     security/p5-GPG (no consumer, not updated since import in 2001)
> +     security/p5-GnuPG-Interface (not updated since 2008, has consumers)
> +     security/p5-PGP-Sign (not updated since 2008, has consumers)
> +     security/tclgpg (no consumer)
> +     security/gpgme (I have a wip diff to move it to security/gnupg2)
> 
> 
> Below is a slightly modified version of the diff I have shown to edd@
> and others.  It treats security/gnupg2 as the only provider of the gpg
> executable, along with a gpg2 compat symlink.
> 
> As Edd notes, the migration path for consumer ports may be as easy as
> replacing security/gnupg with security/gnupg2 in BUILD, RUN and
> TEST_DEPENDS, and bump REVISION.
> 
> Of course, runtime tests would be useful, if only to point out old
> software that should have been adapted to work with gnupg-2.X.
> 
> Regarding the user migration path, the compat "gpg2" and "gpgv2"
> symlinks could be removed for 6.9, or this could be done post-release.
> I would go with the latter but I don't feel strongly about it.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
I would *really* like that.
I have A LOT of scripts which use gpg2, I am going to start the upgrade
asap when this change is implemented but I would like the buffer time. 

I am speaking as a user so I'm sure there might be others like me.

Thanks,
Aisha


> 
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/gnupg2/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.71
> diff -u -p -r1.71 Makefile
> --- Makefile  5 Sep 2020 10:07:43 -0000       1.71
> +++ Makefile  6 Sep 2020 00:24:17 -0000
> @@ -3,12 +3,9 @@
>  COMMENT =    GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement
>  
>  DISTNAME =   gnupg-2.2.23
> -REVISION =   0
> +REVISION =   1
>  CATEGORIES =         security
>  
> -# don't mix up dependencies with gnupg1
> -PKGSPEC =    gnupg->=2
> -
>  MASTER_SITES =       ${MASTER_SITE_GNUPG:=gnupg/}
>  
>  HOMEPAGE =   https://www.gnupg.org/
> @@ -56,12 +53,11 @@ CONFIGURE_ENV =   CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE
>                       LDFLAGS="-L${LOCALBASE}/lib"
>  CONFIGURE_ARGS +=    docdir=${LOCALBASE}/share/doc/gnupg2 \
>                       --enable-gpgtar \
> -                     --enable-wks-tools \
> -                     --enable-gpg-is-gpg2
> +                     --enable-wks-tools
>  
> -# Avoid conflict with gnupg-1.x
> +# compat symlinks, remove for OpenBSD 7.0?
>  post-install:
> -     @mv ${PREFIX}/man/man7/gnupg.7 ${PREFIX}/man/man7/gnupg2.7
> -     @mv ${PREFIX}/bin/gpgsplit ${PREFIX}/bin/gpgsplit2
> +     ln -sf gpg ${PREFIX}/bin/gpg2
> +     ln -sf gpgv ${PREFIX}/bin/gpgv2
>  
>  .include <bsd.port.mk>
> Index: pkg/PLIST
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/gnupg2/pkg/PLIST,v
> retrieving revision 1.22
> diff -u -p -r1.22 PLIST
> --- pkg/PLIST 5 Sep 2020 10:07:44 -0000       1.22
> +++ pkg/PLIST 6 Sep 2020 00:24:17 -0000
> @@ -1,20 +1,21 @@
>  @comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.22 2020/09/05 10:07:44 jca Exp $
> -@option no-default-conflict
> -@option is-branch
> -@conflict gnupg->=2
> +@conflict gnupg-<2.2.23p1
> +@pkgpath security/gnupg
>  @bin bin/dirmngr
>  @bin bin/dirmngr-client
> +@bin bin/gpg
>  @bin bin/gpg-agent
>  @bin bin/gpg-connect-agent
>  @bin bin/gpg-wks-server
> -@bin bin/gpg2
> +bin/gpg2
>  @bin bin/gpgconf
>  @bin bin/gpgparsemail
>  @bin bin/gpgscm
>  @bin bin/gpgsm
> -@bin bin/gpgsplit2
> +@bin bin/gpgsplit
>  @bin bin/gpgtar
> -@bin bin/gpgv2
> +@bin bin/gpgv
> +bin/gpgv2
>  @bin bin/kbxutil
>  @bin bin/watchgnupg
>  @info info/gnupg.info
> @@ -29,16 +30,16 @@
>  @man man/man1/gpg-preset-passphrase.1
>  @man man/man1/gpg-wks-client.1
>  @man man/man1/gpg-wks-server.1
> -@man man/man1/gpg2.1
> +@man man/man1/gpg.1
>  @man man/man1/gpgconf.1
>  @man man/man1/gpgparsemail.1
>  @man man/man1/gpgsm.1
>  @man man/man1/gpgtar.1
> -@man man/man1/gpgv2.1
> +@man man/man1/gpgv.1
>  @man man/man1/scdaemon.1
>  @man man/man1/symcryptrun.1
>  @man man/man1/watchgnupg.1
> -@man man/man7/gnupg2.7
> +@man man/man7/gnupg.7
>  @man man/man8/addgnupghome.8
>  @man man/man8/applygnupgdefaults.8
>  @man man/man8/dirmngr.8
> 

Reply via email to