On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 10:24:28PM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > Is anyone using it though? Why hasn't it been updated in the 12 years since > > import?
> shrug > > > If it's just that they're a bit stale, here's an update for py-quixote > > > to the last version from the 2.x series. > > Why keep a python 2.x version? Nothing depends on it being python2. > I don't see any reason to prevent an update to the python3 versions, it > just looks more involved than a simple update. > what I'm saying is, I don't see any reason to delete these. Being python2-only is the main motivation. Things like that tend to end up causing problems when updating other python ports. So when no one has cared enough to maintain them and nothing else needs them, I like to see them go. > > > If this goes in I think twill could potentially be updated too. what do > > > you think? > > If folks are actually using them, sure. However, having things remain at the > > same version since import almost 13 years ago doesn't look like it's being > > used. > well, thanks for bringing twill to my attention. it does look like > something i'd like to explore using. Sure. If someone cares about a port, it's fine to stay. --Kurt
