Excellent suggestion, but it came days before a stable release.
Wietse
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 26/04/21 1:49 pm, Peter wrote:
> > On 26/04/21 3:10 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> Just in time for Postfix 3.6.0 :-)
> >>
> >> I have a suggestion to simplify this.
> >>
> >> Assuming that most people will not need complex submission or smtps
> >> configurations, we could optimize for the simple case, and go without
> >> any mua_* settings in master.cf:
> >
> > I'm fine with that.
> >
> >> # Choose one: enable submission for loopback clients only, or for any
> >> client.
> >> #127.0.0.1:submission inet n -?? n?????? -?????? -?????? smtpd
> >> #submission inet n?????? -?????? n?????? -?????? -?????? smtpd
> >> #? -o syslog_name=postfix/submission
> >> #? -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
> >> #? -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> >> #? -o smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes
> >> #? -o smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient=no
> >> #???? Instead of specifying complex smtpd_<xxx>_restrictions here,
> >> #???? specify "smtpd_<xxx>_restrictions=$mua_<xxx>_restrictions"
> >> #???? here, and specify mua_<xxx>_restrictions in main.cf (where
> >> #???? "<xxx>" is "client", "helo", "sender", "relay", or "recipient").
> >
> > That's a little bit wordy for my liking, but I'm okay with it.? At the
> > end of the day I just want to do something about people who uncomment
> > this section and then wonder why they're getting warnings in the logs,
> > mainly because it just came up as an issue in IRC.
> >
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> >> #? -o smtpd_client_restrictions=
> >> #? -o smtpd_helo_restrictions=
> >> #? -o smtpd_sender_restrictions=
> >> #? -o smtpd_relay_restrictions=
> >> #? -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
> >> #? -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
> >>
> >> Ditto for smtps (a.k.a. submissions).
> >>
> >> ????Wietse
> >>
>
