Andreas Weigel:
> Hi,
> 
> right before the thread's 4th anniversary ;)
> 
> > Andreas Weigel:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I stumbled upon a very minor bug with regard to parsing the supported
> >> XFORWARD attributes from the EHLO reply in smtpd_proxy: the last
> >> attribute is never acknowledged because when tokenizing, the appended
> >> '\r' is not removed and leads to a failed string comparison in name_code
> >> an thereby to the last attribute not being added to
> >> server_xforward_features.
> >> I guess this has so far never come up because the last in line of
> >> advertised XFORWARD attributes by postfix currently is IDENT, which
> >> seems to never be set in this scenario anyways(?). The attached patch
> >> should fix the issue.
> > Thanks for that fix.
> >
> >     Wietse
> 
> Dragging the originally proposed patch, I just noticed that it was never 
> actually applied, maybe it just got forgotten (and as I originally 
> stated, it does currently not change any relevant behavior, as 
> smtpd_proxy seems to always send out IDENT=[UNAVAILABLE] anyways). In 
> case you would be willing to still apply it, I attach the patch again, 
> created against the current postfix-3.7 branch.
> 

The patch is applied. I do not remember seeing this.

        Wietse

Reply via email to