On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Aaron Wolfe escreveu:
>>
>> NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[216.163.249.229]: 450 4.7.1 Client
>> host rejected: cannot find your reverse hostname, [216.163.249.229];
>>
>> There actually is reverse DNS for this address... 239 PTR records!
>> using 'host' returns them all, with a warning:
>>
>>
>
>   Aaron contacted me in PVT because i had the same problem some months ago.
> Here's what i sent directly to his email, as a reply of the message he sent
> me:
>
> Aaron:
>
> I have this same issue now, on a different platform (debian) and a
> host with 240 ptr records.
> Did you ever find a resolution to this issue with getnameinfo?
>
>
>
> My answer:
>
>>
>>  yes .... it was a glibc bug, not postfix one. Postfix was doing the right
>> thing, but glibc wasnt.
>>
>>  the glibc team patched glibc for that bug. If you're using a pretty new
>> recent distro, the patch should be already applied in your package. If
>> not,
>> you'll probably have to recompile glibc to get rid of this problem.
>>
>>  bugzilla for the fedora team, the distro i used
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428067
>>
>>  and then the same bug for the glibc team
>>  where the problem was acknowledged and fixed
>> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5790
>>
>>
>
>

Thanks for your private reply and post.  I was going to post your
discoveries here too, but in this case I believe the problem is not
glibc (I have version 2.7-10, I believe the bug was in v2.3.6).  The
particular host not only has 200+ PTR records, but many of them are
invalid as pointed out by mouss.  So this seems to be normal behavior
actually, postfix is given an unresolvable result and behaves as
expected.  Thanks for all the help guys!


>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>        Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
>        Leonardo Rodrigues
>        Solutti Tecnologia
>        http://www.solutti.com.br
>
>        Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
>        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>        My SPAMTRAP, do not email it
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to