On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:35:18PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> >Did you see header_checks documented as a supported parameter in
> >http://www.postfix.org/smtpd.8.html (rhetorical question, the answer
> >is no). A closer look at the documentation shows this ia feature of
> >the cleanup service:
> >
> > <http://www.postfix.org/BUILTIN_FILTER_README.html#what>
>
>
> My ignorance is no secret, nor hidden. My error was pointed out to
> me on IRC. Mentioning here was in the interest of passing out trials
> and errors.
>
> I do appreciate the pointer though. So much reading, so many demands.
There is not much joy in catching you with your docs unread, but there
is some hope that in the future you or others will know where to look.
The point is that "-o parameter=value" will only work for services that
are documented to implement that parameter, and for that you need to
check the documentation of the service in question, and also understand
(see OVERVIEW.html, for example) which services are responsible for
which parts of work done by Postfix.
When you step out of main.cf and into the world of master.cf tweaks,
you need much more detailed knowledge/research of Postfix internals...
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
