LuKreme wrote: > On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote: >> I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse, >> intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope sender's >> address. In fact, the only reason I can see, is >> to intentionally deceive the recipient. Is there any other reason? > > Sure there is.
No there isn't. AFAIK, unless I'm misunderstanding something, the rest of your message simply puts what I said above in different terms and agrees entirely. **my mom** was in the From header...nowhere else. The From header can be changed up to say that it came from somebody else. I don't care about that. The check in question is in the smtp transaction, not the data. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
