On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 09:39:54PM +0100, Magnus B?ck wrote:
> On Monday, December 15, 2008 at 21:07 CET,
> Corey Chandler <li...@sequestered.net> wrote:
>
> > Noel Jones wrote:
> >
> > > Don't use a regexp map for this. Generic(5) wildcard rewriting
> > > expects a hash: or other indexed table.
> > >
> > > hash table wildcard example:
> > > @host.example.com @example.com
> >
> > Thanks, Noel-- but if I already have other dynamic changes in
> > generic, how do I apply both a static map and a PCRE map to the
> > same lookup?
>
> foo_maps = hash:/path/to/hashfile, pcre:/path/to/pcrefile
>
> But if you do plan on using a single PCRE map, do use proper escaping of
> regexp meta characters and anchor the end of the string.
>
> /^(.*)@host\.example\.com$/ $...@example.com
>
> But prefer masquerade_domains instead of this. Much easier to get right.
This happens on input, not output, so generic_maps is more appropriate
in some cases. Also it cannot to domain replacement, just sub-domain
hiding. So smtp_generic_maps is a good choice in many cases.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
