On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 03:07:16AM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Victor Duchovni a ?crit :
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 07:51:13PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> >
> >> BTW, is there any reason why one can't do
> >>
> >> joepipe ... pipe
> >> flags=${joe_flags}
> >> user=${joe_user}
> >> args=${joe_command} ${joe_options}
> >
> > The reason is that these arguments are not and should not be subject to
> > main.cf macro substitution.
>
> well, the question was why it is so. I mean what is the risk exactly?
> after all, one can generate master.cf with a script that takes
> definitions from main.cf (or from elsewhere). but I'm sure I'm missing
> something. thus the question.
Well, consider the syntax of "args", and think about how main.cf macro
expansion would interact with it.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
