[email protected] wrote:
Using them as fail-over would really be nice to do and i think shoult work.
postix does not concatenantes these maps because it trys them one by one - in
which order?
is there any documentation on that?
There is no failover for table lookups. You can specify
multiple failover servers for LDAP and *SQL lookups, but there
is not and will never be an "ignore errors" flag.
Either use robust network tables or use a local hash: copy. It
makes no sense to use both.
To answer your original question, tables are consulted in the
order you specify, using the search order documented for the
purpose of the table. If any lookup fails due to table
unavailable, the mail will be tempfailed.
If the network table is listed first and fails, all mail is
tempfailed. If you list the hash: table first, why bother
with the network table?
-- Noel Jones
