> On Nov 22, 2023, at 8:15 PM, DL Neil via Postfix-users > <postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote: > > So, there's no particular advantage to staying with the traditional x86-style > model, nor to moving to the newer Arm-based offerings?
It seems like some vendors really want to push ARM and a side-effect of that might be more bang for your buck. I'm sure plenty of folks still only want to run on x86 or are running something with spotty ARM support for 3rd party packages and they might be convinced with some savings to try ARM... For example, Oracle is offering a free tier that's way, way more generous than others, but only on their ARM servers. If you can get an account there, that's certainly an option. (I'll note I tried with 4 different personal cards and 3 different biz cards both debit and credit to sign up and their "anti-fraud" stuff won't let me in, so YMMV in setting up an account there). Charles > > Linux is offered on both, but am wondering if there is possibly some > processor to work-load (mis-)matching beyond my understanding... > > (yes, appreciate the irony that the concern may be 'efficiency' - despite the > fact that the Postfix server is by no means challenging current capabilities > - and the Cloud-Host assures me that the (two) new choices offer superior > performance to the existing set-up) > > Yes, understand that if one is sharing with some 'hog', our under-average > demands will still be disadvantaged by the averaging-algorithm. However, it's > cheap 'n cheerful... > > > -- > Regards =dn > _______________________________________________ > Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org > To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
