Cody Millard via Postfix-users:
> |Hello list.|
> 
> |
> |
> 
> |I included Spamhaus XBL in client restrictions for my server. An error 
> is supplied to the individual/bot that is trying to connect that looks 
> like the follow:
> 
> |
> 
> |Transcript of session follows. Out: 
        554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; 
> Client host [57.152.56.248] blocked using <DQS_KEY>.xbl.dq.spamhaus.net; 
> Listed by XBL, see https://check.spamhaus.org/query/ip/57.152.56.248 In: 
> ??? Out: 500 5.5.2 Error: bad UTF-8 syntax In: Out: 500 5.5.2 Error: bad 
> UTF-8 syntax In: ? Out: 221 2.7.0 Error: I can break rules, too. 
> Goodbye. For other details, see the local mail logfile *You can see my 
> dqs key in the err*|*or send to the client. Is this a problem? If so, how 
> could I remove the 
> DQS key from the response? *

The rbl_reply_maps are searched with the domain specified with
reject_rbl_client. 

That includes the optional "=address" portion, added in Postfix
2.8, but that was not added to the much older rbl_reply_maps
documentation.

There is an rbl_reply_maps example (a hash map) at
https://docs.spamhaus.com/datasets/docs/source/40-real-world-usage/MTAs/020-Postfix.html

    your_DQS_key.zen.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.0.[2..11]
            554 $rbl_class $rbl_what blocked using ZEN - see ... for details
    ...
    your_DQS_key.zen.dq.spamhaus.net            
            554 $rbl_class $rbl_what blocked using ZEN - see ... for details
    ...

This behavior is different from postscreen; that program searches
the reply table with the service domain (your_DQS_key.zen.dq.spamhaus.net),
i.e. without the optional "=address" or "*weight".

        Wietse
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

Reply via email to