Hi, On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 2:13 PM Wietse Venema via Postfix-users < postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> Alex via Postfix-users: > > Hi, > > > > I've migrated my config and user data from a fedora38 system to a > fedora40 > > system with postfix-3.8.5 and now vacation is segfaulting for some > users. I > > don't understand why it's failing for some while succeeding for others. > > > > Aug 8 12:44:00 cipher postfix/local[403497]: 280B665FBD: to=< > > 61...@example.com>, relay=local, delay=5986, delays=5986/0/0/0.18, > > dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (Command died with signal 11: > "/usr/bin/vacation > > 61104") > > > > Any idea what could be wrong? > > > > I have removed the .vacation.db file in case it was somehow corrupt. I've > > also verified file ownership. > > > > # ls -l .vacation* .forward > > -rw-r--r--. 1 61104 users 40 Apr 15 2022 .forward > > -rw------- 1 61104 users 16384 Aug 8 12:48 .vacation.db > > -rw-------. 1 61104 users 223 Jul 30 2020 .vacation.msg > > -rw-------. 1 61104 users 90 Jul 30 2020 .vacation.pref > > -rw-------. 1 61104 users 158 Jul 30 2020 .vacation.sq > > -rw-------. 1 61104 users 19 Jul 30 2020 .vacation.subj > > > > # cat .forward > > g...@gmail.com > > "|/usr/bin/vacation 61104" > > Is 61104 a user account name, like this? > > postmap -q 61104 unix:passwd.byname Historically bad choice for usernames, but yes, exactly: postmap -q 61104 unix:passwd.byname 61104:x:3400:100:Premier Medicine Hat:/home/61104:/bin/bash How is this different form the 'working' accounts? > That's what I'm trying to figure out. I've also noticed that sometimes it succeeds for the same user and fails other times. Aug 8 14:19:42 cipher postfix/local[454810]: 7BFB371CAE: to=< 14...@example.com>, relay=local, delay=0.11, delays=0.07/0/0/0.04, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: /usr/bin/vacation 14180) Aug 8 14:39:01 cipher postfix/local[458067]: B2AD171CF3: to=< 14...@example.com>, relay=local, delay=1118, delays=1118/0/0/0.13, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (Command died with signal 11: "/usr/bin/vacation 14180") Bad memory sounds like a logical explanation here, and this is a new server, but I just wanted to be sure I'm not missing something else. It's a relatively active server and haven't noticed any other segfaults (other than with vacation) after about 48 hours of operation. Thanks, Alex
_______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
