On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 08:42:51AM -0800, Randy Bush via Postfix-users wrote:
> >>> Randy, I'm disappointed
> >> And I embarrassed. clearly I blew it when creating the new mx
> >> target.
> > I am glad you took the friendly jibe in stride.
>
> stride? i blew it badly, a real stoopid.
>
> > https://list.sys4.de/hyperkitty/list/dane-us...@list.sys4.de/thread/NKDBQABSTAAWLTHSZKC7P3HALF7VE5QY/
>
> ok, hacked a wrapper with a list of servers around it and added to cron
> job.
>
> > which you can loop over each IP address (v4 and v6 as applicable) of
> > each MX host.
>
> early here and not enough coffee. why would i see different results
> for the server's v4 address than its v6 address?
You (as others have) might some day deploy separate actual servers
behind a single logical host with multiple IP addresses, and then
testing just one of the IPs is not enough. Of course, if you have
a load balancer, it gets even more fun.
Some folks fail the tests for a couple days and then succeed, and
then later fail again, because they have two machines behind a
load balancer with different certs, and TLSA records for just
one of them. Notices appear to be ignored...
> thanks for all you do and your patience.
You're quite welcome. I try, and it helps, but only so much, the rest
is up to the operators, who sometimes have enthusiam for deploying cool
things, than for keeping them well oiled. :-(
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
