P.S.: Postfix users wrote in <4z1fyh6j5nzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: |Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users: |> Yes, unfortunately online on a Sunday, i should better have let |> it. Anyhow. I wanted to ask for long why postfix does not |> support the RFC 9057 Author: header, as it fixes a miss that |> starts with DomainKeys, and goes on ever since, and reached the |> mountaintop of madness with the advent of DMARC. | |RFC 9057 appears to target MUA developers, not MTA developers. See |https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9057.html#name-experimental-goals
It seems to me that several old hands feel quite a bit of pain regarding the current state of affairs of email as such. I recall answers from John Klensin (2821, 5321, and more) were a list of in existence email piggybacks were each dressed down with a very short sentence. Not to talk about some distressed threads on the internet history list. So, if you read Dave Crocker's (and that is *that* Dave Crocker) list that you mention above with this in the back of your mind, then the list changes its appearance completely. It almost gets something pleading, really. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) | |In Fall and Winter, feel "The Dropbear Bard"s pint(er). | |The banded bear |without a care, |Banged on himself for e'er and e'er | |Farewell, dear collar bear _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
