On 12/5/25 00:42, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 05:44:57PM -0500, Al via Postfix-users wrote:
Can't help you with "uid"s, unclear why that'd either be known to
Postfix or useful. Only the Postfix local(8) and virtual(8) and
delivery agents deal with "uid"s, in every other context Postfix
deals with email addresses, which are resolved to "uids" only when
running as a user to deliver to user-owned files.
Dec 4 17:17:51 mail dspam[85005]: query error: Column 'uid' cannot be null:
see sql.errors for more details
That's a dspam internal issue, not related to Postfix.
The uid column in the original DSPAM db definition is an auto-increment
primary key. Inserting a new username should create a new uid value
automatically. It has no relation to the unix user uid.
I'm sure I don't need to mention that DSPAM is pretty ancient,
unmaintained and unsupported, but I do it anyway.
Kind regards,
Tom
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
