Hellow Viktor,

Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> writes:

> On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 08:27:49PM +0900, Byunghee HWANG (황병희) via
> Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> Currently, i study about DANE and Email server stuff. While i'm doing
>> test, i found some odd things. As far as i know, 3 1 1 rollover schema
>> have two TLSA records.
>
> Two "3 1 1" records are needed during a key rollover, but while the key
> is stable, a single record suffices.
>
>> soyeomul@yw-1204:~$ dig +short TLSA _25._tcp.mx.pao1.isc.org.
>> 3 1 1 865C0BC73EC3DAC90F73B3D1CF6BA08ECB2848134AAB479B6279FE70 44A0FA89
>
> That's fine.

OK, thanks!

>> $ openssl s_client -brief -starttls smtp \
>>   -dane_tlsa_domain mx.pao1.isc.org \
>>   -dane_tlsa_rrdata "3 1 1
>> 865C0BC73EC3DAC90F73B3D1CF6BA08ECB2848134AAB479B6279FE7044A0FA89"
>>   -connect mx.pao1.isc.org:25
>> [...]
>> Verified peername: mx.pao1.isc.org
>> DANE TLSA 3 1 1 ...4aab479b6279fe7044a0fa89 matched EE certificate at depth 0
>> [...]
>
> Why isc.org's TLSA record is only *one*?  Because one is enough if no
> keyrollover is imminent.

Additionally, i tested TLSA on pfix.imrryr.org as well. After all, i did
understand about whole story with context(s) ["stable", "imminent"].


Sincerely,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to