The issue was a new version of docker and as a result of that the system was 
indeed actually running out of space. I thought the system had plenty of space, 
but it actually didn’t.

I have docker use a separate mount for /var/lib/docker so it doesn’t put 
non-essential stuff in my VM backup (PVE -> (almost pristine) Ubuntu -> docker 
-> postfix in a container). All data lives outside theVM.

As this part of my 2-server setup kept receiving messages (mail kept working 
and it was the active server and /var/lib/docker had enough space) I thought 
the out of storage message was weird. But it wasn’t and I overlooked actual 
storage on / (yes, that is 'stupid me')

I recently had to rebuild my setup when an internal hard disk completely died 
(good test, I was able to recover fully within a reasonable amount of time) and 
the new docker containerd uses /var/lib/containerd for storage (used to be 
/var/lib/docker). This lived on the (small) / volume (16GB) and it quickly had 
filled up with images.

Thanks for your help Viktor, it actually made me look and see what was really 
going on.

And now I will have to wait until 4xx deferred messages are delivered after 
all. Because I did not see your reply until I checked 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg107892.html

G

> On 11 May 2026, at 10:29, Gerben Wierda <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I get two of these from double-bounce@ <mymailserver>
> 
> Return-Path: <double-bounce@<mymailserver>>
> Delivered-To: gerben@<mymailserver>
> Received: from <mymailserver>
>       by snape.rna.nl with LMTP
>       id /fHmMkhEAWrVGAAAy+4yzw
>       (envelope-from <double-bounce@<mymailserver>>)
>       for <gerben@<mymailserver>>; Mon, 11 May 2026 02:51:52 +0000
> Received: by <mymailserver> (Postfix)
>       id CCB1FA290A; Mon, 11 May 2026 02:51:52 +0000 (UTC)
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 02:51:52 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@<mymailserver>>
> To: Postmaster <postmaster@<mymailserver>>
> Subject: Postfix SMTP server: errors from unknown[101.47.29.67]
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> 
> Transcript of session follows.
> 
>  Out: 220 mail.rna.nl
>  In:  EHLO cangrang.cn
>  Out: 250-snape.rna.nl
>  Out: 250-PIPELINING
>  Out: 250-SIZE 25165824
>  Out: 250-ETRN
>  Out: 250-STARTTLS
>  Out: 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
>  Out: 250-8BITMIME
>  Out: 250-DSN
>  Out: 250 SMTPUTF8
>  In:  STARTTLS
>  Out: 220 2.0.0 Ready to start TLS
>  In:  EHLO cangrang.cn
>  Out: 250-snape.rna.nl
>  Out: 250-PIPELINING
>  Out: 250-SIZE 25165824
>  Out: 250-ETRN
>  Out: 250-AUTH CRAM-MD5
>  Out: 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
>  Out: 250-8BITMIME
>  Out: 250-DSN
>  Out: 250 SMTPUTF8
>  In:  MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>
>  Out: 452 4.3.1 Insufficient system storage
>  In:  QUIT
>  Out: 221 2.0.0 Bye
> 
> Now, I get two of these 2 minutes apart for two different IP-addresses (one 
> China, one Hong Kong, and this is weird too because my router should block 
> incoming from China, that is handled by another MX) Anyway, looking in the 
> log, I see an active spammer being rejected:
> 
> May 11 06:59:53 mymailserver smtp_haproxy/postscreen[6992]: CONNECT from 
> [101.47.29.196]:50413 to [192.168.2.2]:25
> May 11 06:59:53 mymailserver postfix/dnsblog[6993]: addr 101.47.29.196 listed 
> by domain zen.spamhaus.org as 127.0.0.11
> May 11 06:59:53 mymailserver postfix/dnsblog[6993]: addr 101.47.29.196 listed 
> by domain zen.spamhaus.org as 127.0.0.3
> May 11 06:59:53 mymailserver smtp_haproxy/postscreen[6992]: DNSBL rank 1 for 
> [101.47.29.196]:50413
> May 11 06:59:58 mymailserver smtp/smtpd[6987]: connect from 
> unknown[101.47.29.196]
> May 11 06:59:59 mymailserver smtp/smtpd[6987]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from 
> unknown[101.47.29.196]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your 
> reverse hostname, [101.47.29.196]; from=<[email protected]> 
> to=<[email protected]> proto=ESMTP helo=<qvwendi.cn>
> May 11 06:59:59 mymailserver smtp/smtpd[6987]: disconnect from 
> unknown[101.47.29.196] ehlo=2 starttls=1 mail=1 rcpt=0/1 quit=1 commands=5/6
> 
> This is normal stuff in my log. At some point this bad operator was rate 
> limited. Good. But why do I get the messages from double-bounce@ in this 
> case? And why is my postfix sending out
> 452 4.3.1 Insufficient system storage
> if it's operating normally (receiving and sending mail and all)?
> 
> Gerben Wierda (LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerbenwierda>, Mastodon 
> <https://newsie.social/@gctwnl>, Bluesky 
> <https://bsky.app/profile/gerbenwierda.bsky.social>)
> R&A IT Strategy <https://ea.rna.nl/> (main site)
> Book: Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture 
> <https://ea.rna.nl/the-book/>
> Book: Mastering ArchiMate <https://ea.rna.nl/mastering-archimate-edition-3-2/>
> YouTube Channel <http://www.youtube.com/@GerbenWierda>

Gerben Wierda (LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerbenwierda>)
R&A Enterprise Architecture <https://ea.rna.nl/> (main site)
Book: Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture <https://ea.rna.nl/the-book/>
Book: Mastering ArchiMate <https://ea.rna.nl/mastering-archimate-edition-3-2/>
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to