On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 03:09:44PM -0400, pgnd via Postfix-users wrote:
> sure. sigh. wouldn't be the 1st time with google "vs" RFCs/standards.
There is no obligation to implement every published RFC. Google do not
(yet) support DKIM with Ed25519, this is not particularly surprising,
adding support for this must not yet have been a sufficient priority.
> what's _not_ convincingly clear to me is what *they* do as a result of their
> ... ahem ... result.
> randomly drop? bucket into spam? nothing?
In a robust implementation the RSA DKIM signature is sufficient. I
don't know whether Google's implementation is robust in that manner.
--
Viktor. 🇺🇦 Слава Україні!
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
