Michael Orlitzky via Postfix-users: > This is on a linux/glibc system, so I was curious about futimes(). The > last mention of proc was removed from glibc's futimes() in 2014, when > the mininum supported version of the linux kernel was bumped past > 2.6.22: > > * https://repo.or.cz/glibc.git/commitdiff/cecf2ed43 > * https://repo.or.cz/glibc.git/commitdiff/d0f5b3f85 > > According to its NEWS file, this was in glibc-2.24. Should HAS_FUTIMES > now be defined on this platform, sparing me from figuring out what is > going on with my clock?
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/futimes.3.html says: ENOSYS The /proc filesystem could not be accessed. This suggests that futimes() can still depend on /proc. > NB: grep suggests that HAS_FUTIMES_AT and HAS_FUTIMESAT do not agree > on that underscore. The macro 'HAS_FUTIMESAT' appears in code for Solaris (SUNOS5) systems. No-one seems to complain. Wietse _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
