On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:31 AM, kj <koffiejunkielistlur...@koffiejunkie.za.net> wrote: > jan gestre wrote: >> >> Received: from 55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net >> (55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.7.191.55]) >> by mail.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEC4148041 >> for <jmgar...@example.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:58:53 +0800 (PHT) >> Message-ID: >> <365683314256959.dtwibjscpdre...@55.red-88-7-191.staticip.rima-tde.net> >> From: "Jeanine" <jmgar...@example.com> >> To: jmgar...@example.com >> Subject: Check it now >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:58:53 +0800 (PHT) >> >> The received from ip address is obviously not the company's real ip >> address, and we have lots of emails like this. > > This is just ordinary spam, not backscatter. If it was backscatter, there > would be trace of a server having bounced it. > > The above was sent from an IP that doesn't accept mail, and judging by that > PTR, it's not a real mail server anyway. If you were using Spamhaus, it > would have been rejected too - it's in PBL and XBL. > > --kj >
Hi KJ, That's the funny thing, I'm using sbl-xbl spamhaus as well as spamcop.net but it wasn't blocked, I've now changed it to zen, I'm not sure though if it would have any effect. Regards, Jan
