Quoting Victor Duchovni <victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com>:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:37:01AM +0200, Helga Mayer wrote:
But I'd prefer not to use DNSBL's by postcreen. It is for the logging.
More detailed logging is on the roadmap...
Users occasionally ask for details if mail did not arrive.
It's not only the logging.
We're currently using blacklists after greylisting and after other
restrictions
to avoid unnecessary queries.
To check the blacklists with postscreen in my opinion would increase the
net traffic and the load on the servers running blacklists.
reject_non_fqdn_hostname e.g. amounts to 30% of all rejects.
If I try, I get:
Jul 6 10:17:00 smtp2 postfix/postscreen[23670]: PREGREET 34 after 0.52
from 90.148.159.227: HELO 90-148-159-227.saudi.net.sa??
Jul 6 10:17:00 smtp2 postfix/postscreen[23670]: panic:
postscreen_dnsbl_done: no blocklist cache entry for 90.148.159.227
What am I doing wrong ?
"panic" is an internal error in the code. This is non-production code.
If it is a bug and not a feature I can live with it.
Which version (mail_version mail_release_date) are you using?
mail_version = 2.7-20090619-nonprod
Helga
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
