On Monday 27 July 2009 20:54:25 Aaron Wolfe wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Benny Pedersen<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, July 27, 2009 23:06, Halassy Zoltán wrote: > >> domain.com. MX 10 real.example.com. > >> otherdomain.com. MX 10 real.example.com. > >> somedomain.com. MX 10 real.example.com. > >> mail.example.com. CNAME real.example.com. > > > > imho mx records must not be a cname > > True, but I don't think there is any problem with the existance > of CNAMEs that refer to the hostname used in an MX record.
Of course not. > I believe it is assumed in the example given that > "real.example.com" has an A record somewhere. That assumption was explicit in part of the post which shouldn't have been snipped from the quote: > ;assuming already set: > real.example.com. A 192.168.2.1 > 1.2.168.192.in-addr.arpa. PTR real.example.com. Message-ID: <[email protected]> -- Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
