Hi,
2009/8/13 Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org>: > Eduardo Júnior wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> i'm trying remove some headers from outgoing messages. >> I read in somewhere that this is enough: >> >> >> -o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/checks_headers > > Where'd you read this misinformation? I don't remember, but wasn't an official documentation. > The header_checks parameter is only used by the cleanup daemon. Right. For this I wanted more information about debug level of the daemons, of the cleanup in special, to analyze the actions from my expressions. > > With header_checks, some choices are to add it to main.cf and remove > matching headers from all mail, define a separate cleanup service for the > after amavisd smtpd reinjection, or use multiple postfix instances with > different header_checks. > > But if you have postfix 2.5 or newer, the easy solution is > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_header_checks > which can be added as a -o option to your outgoing smtp transport. I have two daemons smtp, one to incoming messages, other to outgoing mesages. So, in master.cf I did that: -o smtp_header_checks=regexp:/path/header_checks > >> >> checks_headers: >> ^Received: from amavis IGNORE >> ... > > proper form would be > /^Received: from amavis/ IGNORE > > but you should really make it more specific than this so it only matches > YOUR headers, and not everyone who uses amavis. This was just an example. This match MUST all the line or just the beginning? It's 'cause the line that i want to remove is long, something like that: Received: from [IP] (unknown [IP]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by myserver (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 333333 for <u...@mydomain.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:23:48 -0300 (BRT) > > >> >> I'd like some references about this subject. >> And references about debug level of the daemons (smptd, cleanup, qmgr...) >> I have tried add -v options to cleanup line in master.cf, mas i didn't >> understand what's going on there. > > You'll need to examine the source code for details of what verbose logging > means. Verbose logging is rarely needed for debugging postfix problems, and > is not formally documented. > > -- Noel Jones > []'s -- Eduardo Júnior GNU/Linux user #423272 :wq
