mouss wrote: > Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit : >> >> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib >> > > I don't wanna sound negative, but > - since dovecot solves the problem... > - this can also be handled at fielsystem level > - every time I hear "zlib", someting like "vulnerability" hits my ears. > so if I can vote, I'd say no to zlib integration. this applies to > dovecot too. unfortunately, it seems that Timo is "too open", which > makes the "with security in mind" of dovecot debatable at least. is it > time to move back to courier?
Well, it *is* a plugin, just don't enable it and you're zlib free. I'll agree with you on the "too open" part though. ~Seth
