Mathias Tausig wrote: > I just tried to replace the "\n" with "\r\l", but to no avail. The same > problem remains.
I can be wrong here, but shouldn't that be "\r\n" ? HTH, Mikael
Mathias Tausig wrote: > I just tried to replace the "\n" with "\r\l", but to no avail. The same > problem remains.
I can be wrong here, but shouldn't that be "\r\n" ? HTH, Mikael