On Thursday 17 September 2009 13:40:56 Wietse Venema wrote:
> /dev/rob0:
> > On Thursday 17 September 2009 13:02:20 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:59:25PM -0400, fursink wrote:
> > > > Would the fact that this is 2.3.3... prevent the transport
> > > > from working at all?
> > >
> > > No, and in fact the transport is almost certainly used, but "-o
> > > syslog_name" does not work as expected in 2.3.3. Rather, the
> > > syslog_name is inherited from the master(8) daemon, and cannot
> > > be customized on a per-service basis.
> >
> > There is no note at postconf.5.html#syslog_name regarding the
> > changed behavior in later versions. Should there be such a note?
>
> You mean. all bugfixes get listed in postconf(5)?
I was asking; I didn't know it was a bug originally. :) I thought it
was formerly a master(8)-only setting, whereas now, it can be set
per-daemon with -o.
--
Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless
"/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
