On 15-Feb-2010, at 14:41, Aggelos wrote:
> 
> Return-Path: <steven_m_cr...@hotmail.com>
> X-Original-To: <u...@my.domain.org>
> Delivered-To: <u...@my.domain.org>
> Received: from blu0-omc1-s16.blu0.hotmail.com
> (blu0-omc1-s16.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.27])
>       by <mysmpt.my.domain.org> (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C04FB9D
>       for <u...@my.domain.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:14:49 +0200 (EET)
> Received: from BLU0-SMTP25 ([65.55.116.9]) by
> blu0-omc1-s16.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
>        Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:14:46 -0800
> X-Originating-IP: [222.69.163.146]
> X-Originating-Email: [steven_m_cr...@hotmail.com]
> Message-ID: <blu0-smtp25c0ae687aa29c4655d059c7...@phx.gbl>
> Received: from zjg ([222.69.163.146]) by BLU0-SMTP25.blu0.hotmail.com
> over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
>        Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:14:45 -0800
> Reply-To: <wowaccountad...@admin-blizzard.com>
> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:18:19 +0800
> From: "wowaccountadmin" <wowaccountad...@blizzard.com>

Just as a unrelated point, forward these messages (as attachments or at least 
with complete headers) to ha...@blizzard.com.

They DO go after these sites.

I've fed a couple of dozen to bayes and they no longer get through.

You could also do something like

uri             URI_BLIZZARD /\bblizzard\.com\b/i
mimeheader      MH_BLIZZARD Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
meta            SPOOF_BLIZZARD (URI_BLIZZARD && MH_BLIZZARD)
score           SPOOF_BLIZZARD 1.0

(untested, but something like that)

-- 
'Oook?'
'I like to listen to a man who likes to talk! Whoops! Sawdust and treacle! Put 
that in your herring and smoke it!'
'I don't think he wants one,' said Ponder. --Lords and Ladies

Reply via email to