On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 03:58:54PM +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 13:30 CEST,
> Jerry <postfix-u...@seibercom.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200
> > Victoriano Giralt <victori...@uma.es> articulated:
> >
> > > I can suggest the Spanish schema it has provisions for mail routing
> > > and is in use in several Universities and Higher Ed institutions:
> > > http://www.rediris.es/ldap/schema/iris.schema
> > >
> > > You can read use cases and some other information (in Spanish) here:
> > > http://wiki.rediris.es/gtschema/Portada
> >
> > Perhaps someone with time to spare might be motivated to create a
> > custom schema for Postfix. Personally, I prefer MySQL so it is not
> > something that I would be interested in.
>
> No, a Postfix LDAP schema doesn't make sense. Postfix works with any
> reasonably designed schema. LDAP schemas should match the information
> model and not the tools used to access the information.
There are many possible LDAP schemas that support various Postfix
features. Which schema is most suitable depends a lot on what mappings
one needs to support high level Postfix abstractions such as virtual
mailboxes, virtual aliases, ...
--
Viktor.
