-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:37:48 +0200
> Von: Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebra...@charite.de>
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix

> * Josh Cason <joc...@mychoice.cc>:
> 
> > As most of you guys know. I use mailscanner. I would like
> > recomendations of what else to use. I prefer a all in one package
> > like what mailscanner does. It also utilizes clamav and spamassion.
> 
> So does amavisd-new
> 
If you looking for something that is beyond just being better then I recommend 
CRM114 or DSPAM or OSBF-Lua. If you insist in having the AV included in the 
Anti-Spam tool then use something like DSPAM.

I use all of the above mentioned and all of them are fast and accurate. DSPAM 
is the one that is the easiest to scale and DSPAM is the one using the lowest 
amount of memory (DSPAM alone uses on my setup less then 10MB of memory for 
hundreds of domains having thousands of users in total). From a algorithm 
viewpoint CRM114 is a insane tool. It offers you a lot of algorithms and is 
virtually expendable to anything you like (it includes it's own language).

If you used SA in the past then any of the above will surprise you in terms of 
speed, memory consumption and accuracy.


> -- 
> Ralf Hildebrandt
>   Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
>   Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
>   Campus Benjamin Franklin
>   Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
>   Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
>   ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
>           

-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

Reply via email to