Le Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT), "Daniel V. Reinhardt" <crypto...@yahoo.com> a écrit :
> Only http and https and submission would be allowed. To help > conserve the cost of bandwidth and to make more bandwidth available > to people who want more. You are driving consumers to that kind of access: http://culturekitchen.com/files/netneut_01.jpg I disagree. Right now, this mail is sent from a private adsl line, hosted near Paris, my ip is property of my ISP, Free, and to be able to send mail from my (permanent) ip I just had to uncheck the default parameter in my box configuration page. This costs nothing, and is very effective. Forcing customers to pay more is just commercial scam. Sorry for being off-topic btw, I just want to claim that it is against the consumer best interest to promote such offers, and also poses a higher barrier to entry if people want to make their own use of the Internet, which is what the network was designed for. Unempowering people and wanting them to pay the highest price for the lowest prestation possible is not the best use Internet can have. Furthermore, such measures (dropping port 25 and forcing to pay more) are not technically grounded, and make the providers responsible for the traffic they are transmitting. This, in the EU, should be, (and is, I think) legally a non-sense. People are responsible for the use they make of their computers and their adsl lines, not their providers. Yours sincerely, Xavier -- «Je parle en fou, c'est-à-dire, si je vous parais déraisonner en m'égalant aux faux apôtres, je ne vous paraîtrai pas plus sage en me préférant à eux.»
