On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:13 +1100, James Gray wrote:
> > We've used it for years, had very little complaints, maybe half a > > dozen in all that time. > > SPF is a "must use" IMHO, and by use of "-all" ... providing you > > configure your DNS correctly. > > > > > > ...and then a user puts in a .forward file (or equivalent) to send > mail to another address. Now SPF if broken on the forwarded account > as your mail server very likely doesn't have an SPF record for the > original sender. Ooops - SPF is broken in these Either its too early in teh day , or,.... because what you typed, makes no sense, how do you think mailing lists continue to work. Granted, with M$'s spf2 implementation (RFC 4406 IIRC) it does break, but not utilising RFC 4408. As I said, I've i've used it for years and years and I'm happy with its results, YMMV of course which is why you are anti.
