On 11/4/2010 5:54 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
[email protected],
You are receiving this message from dnswl.org because we try to identify and
notify
current users of our service about upcoming changes.
If you are not the right contact for issues dealing with spamfilters,
whitelisting
and DNS, we would appreciate if you could either forward this message or let us
know about better contacts.
Dnswl.org is changing it's operating model (seehttp://www.dnswl.org/news/ for
more
details), and as part of this change, we are shutting down the rsync service
which
until now was available at rsync1.dnswl.org, and which we believe you are
currently
using.
We made a "best guess" that you could be the contact for the following IP/Domain
we extracted from our rsync logfiles:
IP address 173.50.101.14
Domain sheltoncomputers.com
In order to use the rsync service under the new operating model, all users will
need
to be registered and have a valid, paid subscription. Registration is available
at
https://subscription.dnswl.org
Please note that we will start shutting down the "old" rsync service over the
next
days and weeks. Your access may be affected at any time as well.
If you have questions, please refer to our websitehttp://dnswl.org/ or contact
us
by e-mail [email protected].
Kind regards,
-- Matthias Leisi, dnswl.org project leader
------------------------------------------------------------------------
you know, they could have made a premium service or addition to offset
overhead and generate revenue while having the white and blacklists as
a free service. This means that spamassassin's accuracy, and
opensource, will reduce as well. I guess Im going to have to consider
dspam even more now.
Jerrale G
I was merely saying that changes were going to have to be made to
postfix and/or spamassassin, with which one depending on your
configuration. Why do people get so ANGRY when trying to participate in
online functions where text or original authoring is required?
God Bless,
Jerrale G.
SC Senior Admin