Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Monday, February 07, 2011 2:47 PM -0500 Wietse Venema > <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: > > > Quanah Gibson-Mount: > >> --On Monday, February 07, 2011 11:05 AM -0500 Wietse Venema > >> <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: > >> > >> > Below is a patch that goes further. Like the earlier patch it fixes > >> > the loglevel >= 3 segfault in BOTH smtpd and tlsproxy. In addition, > >> > it makes tlsproxy(8) actually log TLS transactions as expected. > >> > > >> > It works around an undocumented OpenSSL mis-feature, by moving the > >> > SSL_set_fd() call from tlsproxy(8) into the Postfix TLS library. > >> > Apparently, SSL_set_fd() destroys call-back information that is > >> > already set up on an SSL handle. That was causing tlsproxy(8)'s > >> > verbose logging to go nowhere. > >> > > >> > Wietse > >> > >> Hi Wieste, > >> > >> Since there doesn't seem to be a source repository that's accessible for > >> postfix that I can generate a diff from, would it be possible for you to > >> send these patches as attachments rather than inline text? It makes > >> them far easier to handle. > >> > > > > What is the problem with ASCII mail? > > > ASCII mail involves having to do a bunch of otherwise unnecessary editing > to preserve things like tabs in the patch files. Attachments are the > standard practice for patches of every other open source software project I > deal with where getting the source out of something like git, etc, is not > available, specifically because of this.
The mailing list is not a repository. For that, see the Postfix 2.8.1-RC1 release candidate on te FTP site. Wietse