Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Monday, February 07, 2011 2:47 PM -0500 Wietse Venema 
> <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> 
> > Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> >> --On Monday, February 07, 2011 11:05 AM -0500 Wietse Venema
> >> <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Below is a patch that goes further. Like the earlier patch it fixes
> >> > the loglevel >= 3 segfault in BOTH smtpd and tlsproxy. In addition,
> >> > it makes tlsproxy(8) actually log TLS transactions as expected.
> >> >
> >> > It works around an undocumented OpenSSL mis-feature, by moving the
> >> > SSL_set_fd() call from tlsproxy(8) into the Postfix TLS library.
> >> > Apparently, SSL_set_fd() destroys call-back information that is
> >> > already set up on an SSL handle. That was causing tlsproxy(8)'s
> >> > verbose logging to go nowhere.
> >> >
> >> >  Wietse
> >>
> >> Hi Wieste,
> >>
> >> Since there doesn't seem to be a source repository that's accessible for
> >> postfix that I can generate a diff from, would it be possible for you to
> >> send these patches as attachments rather than inline text?  It makes
> >> them  far easier to handle.
> >>
> >
> > What is the problem with ASCII mail?
> 
> 
> ASCII mail involves having to do a bunch of otherwise unnecessary editing 
> to preserve things like tabs in the patch files.  Attachments are the 
> standard practice for patches of every other open source software project I 
> deal with where getting the source out of something like git, etc, is not 
> available, specifically because of this.

The mailing list is not a repository. For that, see the Postfix
2.8.1-RC1 release candidate on te FTP site.

        Wietse

Reply via email to