On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:02:09PM -0500, Daniel Bromberg wrote: > >>> No additional "failover" unless you want some hosts to receive mail >>> only when it fails to deliver to others. I prefer hot-hot. >> >> Just vocabulary question, what is "hot-hot"? > > A high-availability term, in which both sides of an HA cluster process > requests at the same time, as opposed to hot-cold, where only one side > is active at a time. > > -- > Viktor.
Also known as ACTIVE/ACTIVE yes?
